회원학회

회원학회

번호 연구제목 연구자 연구기간 발표실적
내용
120 미병(未病)에 대한 연구 경향 분석 : 국내 논문을 중심으로 강소현, 박선주 2019-08-31 ~ 학회지
Objectives : In this study, We overviewed study trend on ‘Mibyung’ by analyzing articles published in Korea from 1997 to 2019. Methods : We collected research articles on ‘Mibyung’ from 7 Korean research databases using the keyword ‘미병’ and ‘아건강’. Then we analyzed them by publish year, journal, and research subjects. Research subjects were categorized into ‘diagnosis’, ‘relationship with other factors’, ‘trend’, ‘concept’, ‘application development’, ‘policy research’, ‘prevalence and recognition’, ‘clinical report’ or ‘animal study’. Results & Conclusions : The largest number of related articles was published in 2017(12 articles, 26.7%). ‘Journal of Society of Preventive Korean Medicine’ was the journal with the most published articles(16 articles, 35.6%). Most of the research subjects were about diagnosis(11 articles, 24.4%) and analysis on relationship with other factors(10 articles, 22.2%). Little were published on policy(4 articles, 8.9%) and clinical study(1 article, 2.2%). More research on policy and clinical trials should be implemented for future mibyung study.
119 대한예방한의학회지에 게재된 체계적 문헌고찰의 방법론 및 보고 질에 대한 평가 송은혜, 전지희, 이명수, Lin Ang, 김경한, 박선주 2019-08-31 ~ 학회지
Objectives : The publication of systematic reviews (SRs) has increased significantly over the years, and systematic reviews are considered to have the strongest evidence as they are at the top of the hierarchy of evidence pyramid. In this study, a thorough assessment of all SRs published in Journal of Society of Preventive Korean Medicine (JSPKM) was performed to evaluate their reporting quality and methodological quality to better improve the quality of SRs in JSPKM. Methods : JSPKM website was searched to include all SRs published in JSPKM from 1997 to 2018. Two independent researchers assessed the SRs using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR, formerly known as Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews) tool checklist for methodological quality assessment, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline checklist for reporting quality assessment. Results : Out of 618 published articles published in JSPKM from 1997 to 2018, only 3 SRs were identified as SRs. For AMSTAR methodological quality scoring, the average score of 3 SRs was 3.0 out of 11 which is low quality level. For PRISMA reporting quality items, the 3 SRs reported 17.3 items on average out of 27 items. The 3 identified SRs did not provide information on protocol or registration which is included in both AMSTAR assessment tool and PRISMA guideline. Conclusions : Improvements on reporting quality and methodological quality of SRs using relevant tools or guidelines are needed to assure the quality of SRs published in JSPKM so that their conclusions will be more transparent and reliable for decision-making in healthcare and the best clinical practice.
118 대학수학능력시험 수험생들의 한의과대학 진학 동기 및 한의의료에 대한 인식 조사 김현석, 김휘문, 김현호 2019-08-31 ~ 학회지
Objectives : The study was aimed to analyze the College Scholastic Ability Test (CSAT) test-takers’ favor of entering Korean Medicine college and their perception toward the Korean Medicine. The study will present information that can be used for university administrator and in medical education field. Methods : A questionnaire was developed, comprising categories about the favor of entering Korean Medicine college, the experience and reason of receiving Korean Medicine healthcare treatment, and the perception toward the Korean Medicine. Face validity and content validity of the developed questionnaire were tested before survey. Then the questionnaires were distributed to 168 CSAT test-takers. Results : The most positive reason of entering Korean Medicine college is the characteristic of job, while the negative one is of the characteristic of the discipline. Respondents who answered as positive toward Korean Medicine are more than those who answered as negative. The most positive reason of receiving Korean Medicine healthcare treatment and perceiving Korean Medicine positively is because of its medical effectiveness. The most negative reason is responded as et cetera in both categories. Conclusions : The results of the survey may indicate that by promoting recent research progresses in Korean Medicine and benefits from choosing a career as medical professions, more CSAT test-takers will have positive attitude toward Korean Medicine college entrance. Also by promoting the medical effectiveness of Korean medicine to CSAT test-takers, more CSAT test-takers will receive or have positive attitude toward Korean Medicine healthcare service.
117 한약재의 연도·산지·업체별 가격변동 분석 연구 김동수, 임병묵, 현은혜, 이은경 2019-08-31 ~ 학회지
Objectives : This study aimed to analyze price variance by year, region and company of raw herbal medicines to draw payment system for herbal medicine insurances in the National Health Insurance. Methods : To analyse price variance, we used 2015-2017 data of ‘Quality test results of imported herbal medicines’ provided by Korea Pharmaceutical Traders Association and ‘Price data of 56 raw herbal medicines’ that was surveyed by the Association of Korean Medicine. We analysed gap of highest price and lowest price those were compared with average price and coefficient of variation(CV) of prices by year, region and company of raw herbal medicines. Results : In analysing 3 years data, the highest price was 23.2% higher, and the lowest price was 19.1% lower than the average price. As of 2018, the average price of domestic produced herbal medicines was 1,8 times higher than that of imported herbal medicines. By companies, the highest price was 117.5% higher, and the lowest price was 57.3% lower than the average price. Conclusions : The price of herbal medicines varied by production year, region and company. This results suggest that comprehensive payment model needs to be considered in modeling the health insurance coverage for herbal medicine decoctions.